rotated object detection
Learning High-Precision Bounding Box for Rotated Object Detection via Kullback-Leibler Divergence
Existing rotated object detectors are mostly inherited from the horizontal detection paradigm, as the latter has evolved into a well-developed area. However, these detectors are difficult to perform prominently in high-precision detection due to the limitation of current regression loss design, especially for objects with large aspect ratios. Taking the perspective that horizontal detection is a special case for rotated object detection, in this paper, we are motivated to change the design of rotation regression loss from induction paradigm to deduction methodology, in terms of the relation between rotation and horizontal detection. We show that one essential challenge is how to modulate the coupled parameters in the rotation regression loss, as such the estimated parameters can influence to each other during the dynamic joint optimization, in an adaptive and synergetic way. Specifically, we first convert the rotated bounding box into a 2-D Gaussian distribution, and then calculate the Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD) between the Gaussian distributions as the regression loss.
Learning High-Precision Bounding Box for Rotated Object Detection via Kullback-Leibler Divergence Appendix Xue Y ang 1, Xiaojiang Y ang 1, Jirui Y ang 2, Qi Ming
Therefore, KLD has affine invariance. Part of the work was done during an internship at Huawei Inc. Correspondence author is Junchi Y an. Do the main claims made in the abstract and introduction accurately reflect the paper's Did you discuss any potential negative societal impacts of your work? If you ran experiments... (a) Did you include the code, data, and instructions needed to reproduce the main experimental results (either in the supplemental material or as a URL)? [Y es] (b) Did you specify all the training details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they Did you report error bars (e.g., with respect to the random seed after running experiments multiple times)? Did you include the total amount of compute and the type of resources used (e.g., type Did you include any new assets either in the supplemental material or as a URL? [No] Did you discuss whether and how consent was obtained from people whose data you're Did you discuss whether the data you are using/curating contains personally identifiable information or offensive content?
- Information Technology > Graphics (0.42)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.42)
Learning High-Precision Bounding Box for Rotated Object Detection via Kullback-Leibler Divergence Appendix Xue Y ang 1, Xiaojiang Y ang 1, Jirui Y ang 2, Qi Ming
Therefore, KLD has affine invariance. Part of the work was done during an internship at Huawei Inc. Correspondence author is Junchi Y an. Do the main claims made in the abstract and introduction accurately reflect the paper's Did you discuss any potential negative societal impacts of your work? If you ran experiments... (a) Did you include the code, data, and instructions needed to reproduce the main experimental results (either in the supplemental material or as a URL)? [Y es] (b) Did you specify all the training details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they Did you report error bars (e.g., with respect to the random seed after running experiments multiple times)? Did you include the total amount of compute and the type of resources used (e.g., type Did you include any new assets either in the supplemental material or as a URL? [No] Did you discuss whether and how consent was obtained from people whose data you're Did you discuss whether the data you are using/curating contains personally identifiable information or offensive content?
- Information Technology > Graphics (0.42)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.42)
Learning High-Precision Bounding Box for Rotated Object Detection via Kullback-Leibler Divergence
Existing rotated object detectors are mostly inherited from the horizontal detection paradigm, as the latter has evolved into a well-developed area. However, these detectors are difficult to perform prominently in high-precision detection due to the limitation of current regression loss design, especially for objects with large aspect ratios. Taking the perspective that horizontal detection is a special case for rotated object detection, in this paper, we are motivated to change the design of rotation regression loss from induction paradigm to deduction methodology, in terms of the relation between rotation and horizontal detection. We show that one essential challenge is how to modulate the coupled parameters in the rotation regression loss, as such the estimated parameters can influence to each other during the dynamic joint optimization, in an adaptive and synergetic way. Specifically, we first convert the rotated bounding box into a 2-D Gaussian distribution, and then calculate the Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD) between the Gaussian distributions as the regression loss.
MMRotate: A Rotated Object Detection Benchmark using PyTorch
Zhou, Yue, Yang, Xue, Zhang, Gefan, Wang, Jiabao, Liu, Yanyi, Hou, Liping, Jiang, Xue, Liu, Xingzhao, Yan, Junchi, Lyu, Chengqi, Zhang, Wenwei, Chen, Kai
We present an open-source toolbox, named MMRotate, which provides a coherent algorithm framework of training, inferring, and evaluation for the popular rotated object detection algorithm based on deep learning. MMRotate implements 18 state-of-the-art algorithms and supports the three most frequently used angle definition methods. To facilitate future research and industrial applications of rotated object detection-related problems, we also provide a large number of trained models and detailed benchmarks to give insights into the performance of rotated object detection. MMRotate is publicly released at https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmrotate.
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.08)
- Europe > Portugal > Lisbon > Lisbon (0.06)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- (5 more...)